Adhithya Ganesan vs Stijn Paardekooper Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Aug at 02:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Ganesan vs S. Paardekooper

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ganesan 1 - 0 Paardekooper
They have played 3 sets in total, with Adhithya Ganesan winning 2 and Stijn Paardekooper winning 1. The last match between Adhithya Ganesan and Stijn Paardekooper was at the M25 Oldenzaal, 28-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Adhithya Ganesan getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ganesan | 1 |
| Paardekooper | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Oldenzaal(08-28-25)
A. Ganesan vs S. Paardekooper H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.00% (55-45) | Career Total W/L | 61.54% (40-25) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Ganesan vs S. Paardekooper Match Preview:
- Ganesan's second serve win rate over the past six months is 44.43%, outperforming Paardekooper's 39.87%. Does this offer Ganesan an edge? Likely, as there's a strong connection between this stat and match outcomes.
- For recent first and second serve returns, Ganesan shows better performance, leading with 49.75% and 31.57%, compared to Paardekooper's 34.65% and 25.57%.
- Under pressure, Paardekooper excels in saving breakpoints, achieving 64.91% versus Ganesan's 55.41%, a key factor in tense match moments.
- Considering overall yearly match victories, both players are close, with Ganesan at 58.33% and Paardekooper at 56.52%.
- On clay surfaces, Paardekooper has the upper hand, boasting a win rate of 63%, slightly over Ganesan’s 60%.
- Both players mostly compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Ganesan holding a minor advantage in match wins at this tier.
- Ganesan faces generally lower-ranked opponents, average ranking 397.5, compared to Paardekooper's tougher field averaging 185.91 in rank.
- In pressure-filled deciding sets, Ganesan has a success rate of 50%, markedly better than Paardekooper's 25% win rate.
- Ganesan also shows superior breakpoint conversion at 37.43%, compared to Paardekooper's 31.58%, a potential decisive factor in winning games.
Editorial Prediction (August 28, 2025, UTC):
Observing the recent performance and statistical trends, Ganesan demonstrates stronger second serve performance, giving him a slight edge in predicting match outcomes. His ability to win a higher percentage of return games further solidifies his advantage.
While Paardekooper excels in saving breakpoints, Ganesan's better performance in converting breakpoints and handling deciding sets could be pivotal. Despite facing less challenging opponents generally, these attributes suggest a potential advantage in clutch situations.
Paardekooper does have the upper hand on clay, but the overall stats favor Ganesan given his recent success in matches and consistent performance metrics.
The likely winner of the upcoming tennis match is Ganesan, considering his superior statistics in recent form and key performance areas.
Adhithya Ganesan vs Stijn Paardekooper Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Ganesan vs S. Paardekooper H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:9:55 | Average Match Time | 2:9:55 |
| 67% (56/84) | 1st Serve % | 63% (57/90) |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (35/57) |
| 61% (17/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 44% (40/90) | Return Points Win % | 37% (31/84) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Ganesan Recent Matches Played
S. Paardekooper Recent Matches Played

A. Ganesan vs S. Paardekooper Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.00% (55/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.54% (40/25) |
| 54.31% (126/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.73% (89/60) |
| 52.03% (1152/1062) | Games Win/Loss | 53.46% (765/666) |
| 54.69% (35/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.91% (37/20) |
| 52.63% (10/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 359 | Aces Total | 121 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 398 | Total Double Faults | 89 |
| 1:43:46 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 397.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 302.92 |
| 63% (4350/6903) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1507/2380) |
| 66% (2865/4350) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (987/1507) |
| 48% (1234/2553) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (425/873) |
| 45% (320/709) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (104/245) |
| 41% (2763/6660) | Return Points Win % | 41% (956/2344) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.78% (52/38) | Futures W/L | 61.54% (40/25) |
| 55% (54/99) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (39/64) |
| 47% (15/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 48% (16/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 91% (53/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (40/35) |
| 9% (53/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (40/5) |
| 15% (47/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (25/5) |